
Police charged the father of a 5-year-old girl with child abuse after the girl was spotted behind the wheel of a speeding pickup truck.
The father told police he was trying to teach his daughter how to drive by having her sit in his lap!!
The man was released from jail on $5,000 bond.
Sure... and Santa Claus comes to my house everyday for my cookies...
*the guy's an idiot*
(I've always said you should prove you're smart enough to reproduce before you can do so)
Oh come on, if it is legal to kill the little rascals when they are babies, how bad can it be to put them behind the wheel of an internal combustion engine in traffic?
Moderator ,
Wake up and smell the troll droppings .
he should not have been released and if he is this irreresponsible with this child he should even be raising or have custody of her!
#1.1 *the guy's an idiot*
May be an idiot, also was proving (his) smartness!
However, alas, it becomes an idiotic smartness.
little rascals
good one! lol
Didn't anyone tell him that when he's applying for a darwin award, he's not supposed to take the children with him. she might end up being smarter than him.
Oh come on, if it is legal to kill the little rascals when they are babies, how bad can it be to put them behind the wheel of an internal combustion engine in traffic?
ROFL troll much?
Seriously, who can believe outrage about possible injury from those who advocate killing babies?
You have zero credibility on that issue
alanwillingham ,
To whom are you trolling this comment ?
nonStitiousZealot - To whom are you trolling this comment ?
Let me address your personal attack and attempt at denigrating insult by stating clearly to you that should you continue this hyperbole and attempted character assassination, this will be my last response to you
Now....
The subject under discussion is whether the five year old girl was endangered by the activity described concerning her father
Those who advocate the intentional death of innocent children seem to be expressing opinions on this subject
My perspecive is that such posters have no credibility with me
It was all right there in the earlier posts
My accusation of trolling is not a personal attack .
It is my observation about your actions .
If what you're doing is not trolling , what point are you trying to make?
Those who advocate the intentional death of innocent children seem to be expressing opinions on this subject
My perspecive is that such posters have no credibility with me
What posters ?
What children ?
It was all right there in the earlier posts
What earlier posts ?
Get to the point already .
The point that he's trying to make is that the same people that believe it is ok to kill innocent babies with "abortions" are commenting on this post that it is a travesty that this man would endager his daughter by driving like a maniac with her in his lap in the driver seat. That you can't be concerned about little kids safety if you're going to say it's ok to kill "abort" un-born babies.
And without putting in my opinion into this little spat between you two lol... can anyone define troll for me? The only people I see calling out trolls (not just here but all over newsvine) seem to only do so to those that come in with an opposing viewpoint... maybe I'm just making that up, I dunno. I'm only asking about trolls not to argue about babies or either of you guys.
Calling someone a troll is an accusation that they are intentionally dishonest because a troll does not enter a discussion to add an honest opinion or suggest another point of view be considered, but is attempting to hijack the discussion, and inflict emotional distress
If enough posters become discouraged with the off topic subject matter, they will begin to leave and seek other articles and seeds, so essentially, the troll is trying to kill the number of votes by the author or seeder by causing distress to anyone who becomes aware of the disruptive nature of those actions
The goal of a troll is to discourage others from following the thread (in this case child endangerment) and instead focus on his preferred topic (in this case, personal attacks and insults)
Those who are fair minded enough to examine the posts can easily determine for themselves if there is any tolling behavior, and from whence it came
Ok ruthlessmoose ,
Thanks for your clarification .
Is troll the correct term for comment 1.2 ?
I still think so . Here's why .
Apparently alanwillingham and Lkessler
have been in a heated argument elsewhere
about abortion [my guess] . By discrediting Lkessler's
comment based on the abortion disagreement he is inviting
the original argument to break out in this seed .
This would hijack the discussion from
the child abuse topic right back to abortion .
Here is more evidence .
He never mentions Lkessler by name , just uses the pronoun "you" .
He doesn't do that because it would point to the original
disagreement about abortion .
I attempted to get him to express who his disagreement was with
but all he did was start this "I'm the one with spit on my face " BS , thinking it could scare me off .
It was just a ruse to cover up his not revealing his adversary .
I'm not fooled . I'm not scared .
alanwillingham ,
Thanks for your accurate explanation of trolling .
For another similar description see the link I posted in 2.10
I'm sure you are coming from a moral plane .
You believe you are doing the "right thing " .
I get it .
But you are still trying to hijack this discussion .
Apparently you are a 1 topic poster .
My suggestion is go back to the original discussion
and post there . Stop following Lkessler into
unrelated topics .
Give it a rest man !
Now I get it, thanks erryone.
Let's hang that scumbag,letting her drive on his lap,I can't believe he was so careless as to even allow her to drive down a road in a car. Does he not realize that driving in a car is the most dangerous thing as Americans that we do. No kids allowed in cars from now on,home schooling for all at least till there 30!
LoL !
Apparently you are a 1 topic poster .
Here are three I wrote and posted
Obama Scopes Hot Girl Who Contributes To Global Warming
.
Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome and Snake Toungued Sally Quinn
.
Sarah Palin Confounds Liberals- But They Can't Help Loving to Hate Her
.
Where's the sense - Ya... why does a 5 year old need to be learning how to drive anyways?
Well, at first I was going to say it was no big deal. My dad used to let us kids sit on his lap and drive while he ran the pedals, but that was in the fields and the back roads and at speeds of maybe 20 mph. Speeding and around other cars, though? Not so good.
I could see a reckless driving charge . Maybe .
But child abuse ? NO .
The fact that they went with the child abuse charge
says to me they don't have a case .
If they can't prove reckless driving they can't
prove child abuse .
BTW , if this was a boy child would the
charge be the same ?
Good point, nonStitious. And I hadn't thought about what if it had been a boy. Of course, that would make a difference. (Not that it should, but you know it would.)
I might only be half serious here but , the cops and the
judge that convict in a case like this should be awarded
custody of the child , whether they want it or not .
That might cut down on these excessive arrests .
#2 Speeding and around other cars, though? Not so good.
To study driving, that too to a 5 y.o., that was absolutely not the perfect ‘scenario’. It would be at home, sitting in a sofa or chair.
#2.1 But child abuse ? NO .
This can’t never be a child abuse. The girl would also be interested to sit in her dad’s lap and take control of the wheels. This is reckless driving. No other charge doesn’t exist.
#2.1 if this was a boy child would the charge be the same?
Logically thinking it should be the same (for 5 y.o.). Anyway, police officer’s have a different logic. See, here it was charged as ‘child abuse’!! if it was another officer, he might have said ‘parent abuse’!!!
bvdev ,
You're going to have to learn to avoid double negatives .
I know what you mean but I'm not sure others do .
learn to avoid double negatives
Yes, will take l'l more care in this area. Thanks for pointing out. Haven't noticed it (may be because one never sees their own faults!!).
Glad to help .
If you like I can correspond with you privately if
you need help .
I too will be happy to receive help. May correspond privately.
bvdev ,
I'll be sending you a private message .
In the meantime let me give you some
public advice . When you seed an article
that has the potential to be controversial
like this one , you attract "trolls" .
For an explanation see:
http://ladyklitschko.newsvine.com/_news/2009/06/08/2909556-it-takes-a-village-idiot-the-jerks-of-online-forums
If you also would like my explanation just ask a question here .
After you understand what a troll is , come back here
and look at the 2 comments from alanwillingham .
I have been covering for you but it is up to you
as the moderator to first warn this person and then
, if they persist , delete their comments .
Only you can delete their comments .
You've got some homework to do .
nonStitiousZealot - After you understand what a troll is , come back here
and look at the 2 comments from alanwillingham .
Or better yet, refer to the CoH before someone steers you into mischief
(1) Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks. If you see something disrespectful or inappropriate, report it
The series of personal attacks by nonStitiousZealot are in violation of that policy
The series of personal attacks by nonStitiousZealot
I called you a troll . That is an observation , not an attack .
I stand by that .
If you want to report me for that , go for it .
But watch out ! They may end up calling
you a troll .
You are taking advantage of an inexperienced seeder .
She has a lot of friends . Don't be surprised when they
get mad at you .
As you pointed out the CoH says to address issues . You are trying
to force this off topic .
While I don't know the exact laws in NM, a fair amount of states consider child endangerment as a form of child abuse. Maybe a little over the top, but then again this guy sounds like an idiot and probably mouthed off to the cops claiming he had a right to teach his 5 y.o. in that manner.
Also, calling alanwillingham a troll is like calling the sun bright, not much of an attack.
I have seem him try to steer a multitude of topics towards abortion, no matter how far off the mark the topic was from anything remotely to do with abortion.
The subject is child endangerment, not personal attacks
Thanks for your comments Stone .
a fair amount of states consider child endangerment as a form of child abuse.
Point taken
At the risk of sounding like a Muslim mystic
if the enemy of my enemy is my friend
I'm sending you a friend request .
Also I liked what I saw on your home page . :o)
alanwillingham ,
The subject is child endangerment, not personal attacks
There you go again !
nonstitious this is to child abuse the man should be charged with child abuse if he was risking his child's life and yes it would be the same charges if it were a boy!
M.Nash .
From your comments I conclude from the following choices :
1] This person is not familiar with the English language .
2] This person is extremely emotional about this topic
but has no evidence to support their position .
If the motive is #2 , then calm down , take a breath , ask
yourself why are you saying this .
How could this be under child abuse?
What is the criterion? Could you explain M. Nash?
It's OK, there is risking life (which is applicable for both). Anyway the kid as well as dad like IT, means the kid taking control of the wheels...!!
My goodness we should take him out and lynch him for doing something like this. /sarcasm
I mirror the sentiments that rachealwhite had in comment #2, perhaps he got lost in the moment of being with his child. Didn't make what he did anymore reckless and probably should have been pulled over for reckless driving and speeding. If there was seatbelt laws then those would have applied to, but child abuse? That's reaching by a lot.
Hi Alex ,
A child abuse charge is reaching a lot .
If anything more than reckless driving , the charge
should have been "child endangerment" .
The fact that it wasn't shows that the cops
are just hitting below the belt .
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |